Tuesday, 4 November 2008

Top 10 reasons why sex at the speed of light is not an advisable form of procreation

The Joy of Sexual Physics
with Dr John

"Love is a matter of chemistry, sex is a matter of physics"

10. Penile length contraction:
According to the relativistic theory of length contraction, this is an inevitable consequence of performing sex at the speed of light. An average penis of length 13cm traveling at 99% the speed of light will contract down to a length of only 1.8cm (this is about the same length as the smallest functional penis officially recorded). At the speed of light, length contraction leads to an interesting paradox in which the penis seems to have no length at all, but is still managing to have sex somehow.

9. Penile black hole formation:
At the speed of light, relativity also predicts that the penis will attain infinite mass, essentially becoming a black hole. When its owner realises that his penis has turned into a black hole, he will become profoundly depressed and overcome by a feeling of loss. John Bobbitt would understand; but Mr Bobbitt had his penis sewn back on, whereas a penis lost to a black hole is a penis lost forever.

8. Penis vaporisation:
If the penis is not lost to a black hole, it will be lost to the uncaring force of friction. A penis traveling in and out of a vagina at close to the speed of light will be subjected to enormous resistive forces. Since resistive forces are proportional to speed, this will heat up the penis enormously. The temperature of the resulting internal environment will be so high that the penis molecules will actually undergo a phase transition into a gas, vaporising the penis almost instantaneously.

7. Relativistic flaming semen:
In the unlikely event that a vaporised penis can perform ejaculation, then the relativistic semen will create enormous air resistance, burst into flames almost instantaneously, and generate enormous impact forces. These forces will be sufficient to pierce a small hole straight through a woman's lower torso, just like a speeding bullet, only incinerating the surrounding tissue as it passes through.

6. Time-dilated necrophilia:
Unfortunately, the woman will probably be dead before ejaculation anyway. According to the relativistic theory of time dilation, then if the man is to actually thrust in and out at a speed infinitesimally close to the speed of light, then from his point of view, his partner will be ageing extremely quickly, and will be long dead before he ejaculates. Legally, he will be committing necrophilia.

5. Lack of visual appeal:
Time-dilated necrophilia, flaming relativistic ejaculation and penile black hole formation are all very dramatic, but unfortunately they don't translate well onto the big screen. In reality, relativistic sex would only last for a fraction of a second, and would appear as a sort of muddy grayish white smudge, since the eye merges all images together at such high speeds. This is probably not visually appealing enough to make a porn-at-the-speed-of-light series out of.

4. Religious values:
Certain branches of Christianity would view porn-at-the-speed-of-light immoral anyway. It's in the Bible.

3. Property damage:
A penis is made up of a collection of charged molecules, and accelerating charged molecules emit radiation. To accelerate charged penis molecules up to the speed of light in a single thrust requires enormous acceleration. This will produce a frequency and intensity of radiation similar to that produced by a small nuclear explosion. It may be worth hiring out a hotel room if you don't want your own room obliterated.

2. Deafening sonic booms:
As a penis accelerates up to the speed of light, it will inevitably surpass the sound barrier, producing deafening sonic booms with every inward and outward thrust. If the neighbours haven’t already been woken by your moaning, they will be now. Or then again maybe not, because they will be conveniently deafened and unable to hear you.

1. Excessive dietary requirements:
The amount of energy required to accelerate an average person up to 99% the speed of light for a single inward thrust is approximately equal to 16 million billion kilojoules. This is equivalent to the amount of energy gained by consuming 78 trillion weetbix. But 78 trillion weetbix will increase an average person’s mass by approximately 1.2 trillion kilograms, requiring them to eat even more weetbix just to accelerate this additional load up to the speed of light. Nine out of ten nutritionists may recommend weetbix, but this is slightly more than the recommended daily intake.

Woah. The best article ever. 'nuff said.

Found it here, go there to read more about The Joy of Sexual Physics. With more intriguing articles, such as "It wasn't me... it was the rest of the Universe", "Sex with genital piercings is a matter of electrodynamics" and "The wormhole-assisted masturbation technique".

Remember kids, this stuff is probably K-15 at best, so if you aren't sure, don't clicky on the linky... also, don't do drugs.

May the Sauce be with you.

--Cheesemeister--

19 comments:

Pyry said...

What? You read it? I didn't. Sounds like crap International humor to be honest.

Cheesemeister said...

[rant mode]
For fucks sake! Could you pople at least bother to read the whole damn thing before making dumbass comments? How can you even make that kind of assumption Pyry if you haven't read the article first. It's like refusing to taste some kind of food because some drunk guy in a bar told you that its crap... Read it first, then comment on how good/bad it was. Same goes for your first comment Olli. It cannot be stated that it is crap if you haven't read it first. [\rant mode]

Cheesemeister said...

Actually, its legal to buy a porn magazine at the age of 15, as long as there is no video content.

Meeri said...

I have actually thought about that sometimes too! Maybe there's just something like "you have to know basic things about birth control, diseases etc. that you are able to understand the difference between porn and real life".

Still, I guess the must-be-18 tag doesn't stop curious youngsters. And the age of consent is also flexible when both are younger or at the same physical and psychological level or something.

Meeri said...

In seven comments the word "actually" has been used five times. :D

(and the word verification says this time "foxylens", I laughed)

Johannes said...

[Unnessacery sarcasm tag]
Oh hooray! I've always wanted to know what it would be like to have sex at the speed of sound![\Unnessacery sarcasm tag]

But seriously Tony, what the hell? Not even I would post anything like this. :D

Cheesemeister said...

"...sex at the speed of sound!..."

It was about the speed of light, actually.

Cheesemeister said...

P.S Why would I post something like this?

Because as we all know, the entire previous post was annihilated because it was too serious. This one is not. Its hilarious because it takes two points of deep scientific interest, sex and the speed of light, and turns them into something utterly hilarious, yet informative at the same time. Ergo, now you know why its not a good idea to attempt to have sex at the speed of light. Also, I found it funny.

But, YOU made it serious. Thus paradoxially bringing us full circle. Its funny to most other people I've shown it to. If you can't take a joke, atleast don't call it crap. And no, its not "sexually offensive", Olli. I did also warn people of the potentially K-15 content in my post. Jeez.

All I know is that is that I found it to be amusing, and so did some other people i know, and yet when I post it here to break the ice from the previous "TRK is getting too serious" business, the comments-board turns into a complete shitstorm of unnecessary "crap-taging" and asking me why i posted the article...

As I recall I've previously placed a funny disclamer on the bottom of our blogpage, and it has been removed twice. Yet both times it has, atleast in partial, read:
"Warning! You need a sense of humor to view our site, if you don't have a sense of humor, or are easily offended, please turn back now!", or something to the effect.

Hrmmph... -_-

Cheesemeister said...

If the last part of the previous comment is untrue, I will add that disclamer now, just to be on the safe side.

Meeri said...

(Well I might say I'm not the one to say anything for this. I made a presentation with the title "Luumukiisselin suhde kvanttimekaniikkaan" when I was 12...)

Pyry said...

I'm against deleting posts.

Johannes said...

Its a post that's not that bad it should be removed. Something that would, however would be for example my first blog post.

The Narrator said...

I have several comments to make...

"Cue Sak making fun of me for me trying to make this discussion semi-serious."
Quite good indeed. I think we should one day try to post comments to an article posing as each other, we should be pretty good at it.

Also, I though of how, if considering TRK as a political spectrum we would find the two extremes to be represented by Tony and Olli. With me and Pyry somewhere in between.

But you should take a moment from ye differences and realise how interesting it is that you two are still good friends despite very different views and approaches.

Otherwise, I did find the post mildly entertaining.

Pyry said...

I would be in the middle if I did care. I would vote for Keskusta if they weren't such a landepaukku.

Olli Tony being a porvari isn't anything special. Tell me someone who isn't one. We live in Espoo. We are the porvari city. Even though I think both you and Tony are porvari, it doesn't deny the fact you two are both extreme. At least in TRK. Kaikki on suhteellista.

Johannes said...

Anyone fancy a pie?

Cheesemeister said...

Yes please, got sauce?

The Narrator said...

Now I really cant be assed to read of tha political blabble...

I didnt actually mean real politics. I just mean us, as in TRK.

In many ways I think Tony is, as a person, the opposite of Olli. He is somewhat extreme in his goofyness, occasionally lazyness, inpunctuallness, etc.

Whereas Olli is the opposite, studious, punctual, logical.

Tony is the crazy artisty bohemian hippy dude, where as olli is the walking calculator which aspires to study law.

Cheesemeister said...

And how!

Unknown said...

What said?


toronto magician